|
2003 2001
2000 1998 1996
1995 1994 1993 1992
Note: Much of the content in the 2004 issue of Financial Industry
Perspectives is based on a survey of community banks. The survey
itself is not included in Financial Industry Perspectives, but a
complete copy, along with statistical summaries of responses, is available
in Summary Results--Survey of Community Banks in the
Tenth Federal Reserve District. For survey results of states whose
sample was sufficient to publish separately
click here.
From the Mountains to the
Prairies: The Banking Environment in the Tenth Federal Reserve District
By David Klose
The Tenth Federal Reserve District consists of many types of markets within
which District institutions operate. Since conditions in the District
environment can vary from dynamic to slow-growing, these markets offer both
challenge and opportunity that financial institutions must understand to be
successful. But what is the level of change in the District environment and
how might that change be materializing? This article considers the
environment within the Tenth District and discernible trends within that
environment. We highlight the major factors that influence bank behavior and
condition, including demographic, economic and structural conditions and
trends. The 2000 census information is used in conjunction with that of
prior census surveys to describe where the District is today and from where
it has evolved demographically. Economic data, including gross state product
information, allows us to report the shifts in industrial focus for various
markets and the District as a whole. The article also considers changes in
the industry and describes how banking consolidation has evolved within the
District. Finally, the article looks at potential future trends, to shed
light on emerging environmental factors of which District banks may take
into account in their planning process.
The 2004 Survey of Community
Banks in the Tenth District
By Forest Myers and Eric Robbins
Periodically, the Federal Reserve Bank of
Kansas City surveys Tenth District bankers for their views on a variety of
matters. In February 2004, we solicited banker opinion on a number of topics
pertaining to governance and staffing practices, vendor management
practices, competitive environment and future prospects, interest rate risk
management practices, internet banking services, and payments system issues.
This article briefly sets out the survey methodology and describes the
applicability of survey results to the entire population of District banks.
It also reviews what bankers told us about their environment, competition,
and future challenges. Broadly speaking, survey results can be generalized
for all Tenth District banks. The representative community bank in the
District has assets less than $150 million, is family-owned and locally
controlled, and is headquartered outside a metropolitan area. The economic
and competitive environment these banks face depends, in part, on growth
prospects and diversification opportunities within their communities. Their
most intense loan and deposit competitors are other community banks. Their
greatest challenges involve basic aspects of successfully managing a bank:
funding, income sources, and meeting competition. Despite identifying many
problems, all but a few bankers expect their banks will remain in business
and succeed.
Technology Outsourcing: A
Community Bank Perspective
By Eric Robbins and Joe Van Walleghem
This article provides an overview of the technology industry that has
evolved to provide technology outsourcing services for community banks, and
the risk management issues associated with outsourcing. The service provider
industry is in a transition phase being brought about by changing economic
fundamentals in banking and in information technology. These factors have
contributed to significant consolidation among the technology companies that
serve the banking industry, especially among technology firms offering core
processing services. Accordingly, the array of firms serving the national
and regional markets has changed significantly. The increasing reliance of
banks on technology service providers to support core bank processes has led
to heightened attention on the risks of new technologies. Awareness of the
growing importance of these risks has led to development of a standardized
framework for managing the risks related to technology outsourcing. Survey
results that point to practices most widely followed by community banks are
used to highlight current practices and regulatory guidance for managing
technology risks.
Corporate Governance: Where Do Tenth District Community Banks Stand?
By Forest Myers and Jane Padget
Troubles at publicly traded companies have led to the passage of recently
enacted laws that add more rigor and formality to the corporate governance
process. Most of these reform proposals and new laws focus on protecting
investors in publicly traded firms. Relatively few Tenth District community
banks, however, are publicly traded or are subject to new laws that would
require them to change their corporate governance practices. Indeed, many
are small in asset size, family-owned, closely held, and owner-managed.
Given these characteristics, the governance process at community banks tends
to be less formal and structured than requirements for publicly traded
companies. What then has been the impact of corporate governance reform on
community banks? Have community banks perceived benefits from the practices
recommended by proponents of a more formal governance process? Although not
required to do so, have community banks adopted any of the practices
required of publicly traded companies? To answer these questions, the
analysis in this article used information obtained from 26 governance
questions included in the 2004 Tenth District Community Bank Survey. These
questions dealt with matters that receive attention by good governance
proponents, including board size, composition, committee structure,
compensation, succession planning, director assessments, and other
governance matters. Because ownership structure and size can influence the
governance process, the analysis divided the survey data by family- and
non-family-ownership, and within these ownership categories smaller and
larger banks (assets less than $150 million, assets greater than $150
million). The conclusions drawn from the analysis are that Tenth District
community banks have adopted many principles advocated by strong governance
proponents. However, larger and more complex organizations are more likely
to have adopted recommended governance principles. Further, non-family-owned
organizations, regardless of size, proportionately engage in more of
recommended practices than do family-owned organizations.
|